To Saara:
(I have marked <==== where I suggest other marking. 
<===== = means that the to original marking there should be added a =,
like =H:n should be ==H:n.)

:::: Saara's comments
TT:  Tronds comments
LA121107 - Lene newest comments

New tags
========
I have changed some of the tags in sme-dis.rle:
@ADVL> is now: @>ADVL 
@N> is now: @>N 
@A> is now: @>A 
@P> is now: @>P 
@Num> is now: @>Num
@Pron< is now: @Pron< 
@APP-Pron> is now: @APP>Pron 

::: These are now in the code

Input doesn´t match
===================
I get this when I use the cg-analyze of bigkorpusVISL.txt as input to cg2visl script: 
Input did not match:    "gilli" N* Der1 Der/Dimin N Sg Loc @ADVL>
Input did not match:    "gullevaš" A* Der3 Der/vuohta N Sg Acc @OBJ
Input did not match:    "vuoiŋŋastit" V* IV* Der2 Der/ahtti V TV Ind Prs Sg3 @+FMAINV

::: I am aware of this error, we were hesitating what to do with
them (the tags), in the meantime I could of course add them to the structure.

TT: I think it is better to do something with them, so that we get a clean output.
    What about deleting them

Errors
======
I see that CS disappears!
::: Fixed.

When there is a propernoun involved, the grouping doesn´t function.
::: Fixed

"1960-logu rádjai" disappears in: 
Muhtun sámi biktasiid, nugo gápmagiid ja vuoddagiid, sii geavahedje guhkit, gitta 1960-logu rádjai.
::: Fixed.

About some tags:
================
- All infinite verbs should get :v(nfin) 
::: Fixed.
::: Another question: How the sentences like mun lean nohkan should be
marked the group +FMAINV and -FMAINV?

- CC @CVP should get CO:conj (now it gets SUB:conj-s)
::: Fixed

@-FOBJ > Od
============
SME433 Dál de viimmat asttan čállit reivve.
A1
A:adv('dál')	Dál
A:adv('de')	de
A:adv('viimmat')	viimmat
P:v('astat',TV,ind,pr,1sg)	asttan
									<==== Od:cl
Od:v('čállit',TV,inf)	čállit		<==== =P:v(nfin)
@-FOBJ:n('reive',sg,acc)	reivve 	<==== =Od:n
.

SME690 Mus lea viežžat čázi.  
A1
A:pron('mun',<pers>,1sg,loc)	Mus
									<==== P:g
P:v('leat',IV,ind,pr,3sg)	lea		<==== =D:
H:v('viežžat',TV,inf)	viežžat		<==== =
@-FOBJ:n('čáhci',sg,acc)	čázi	<==== Od:n	
.

::: Fixed.

 
@PRON< is D to the pronoun, like in:
====================================

Moai Birehiin barge mánáidgárddis.
				S:g
Moai 			=H
Birehiin   		=D 		(@PRON<)
barge			P:v
mánáidgárddis.	A:n

::: Fixed.


Son ii máhttán ieš vuodjit biillain.
			S:g-
Son			=H:pron-
			P:g-	
ii			=D:
máhttán 	=D:
			-S:g
ieš 		=D:pron		(@PRON<)
			-P:g
vuodjit		=H:v(nfin)
billain.	A:n

::: I implemented this, but it needs to be tested. So these tags in
::: vislcg they don't have to be symmetric? 
::: As in here, the tags cross:  S:g- P:g- -S:g -P:g

D+H+D
=======
SME566 Vuosttaš logi minuvtta lei buorre áigodat Nordlysa ektui.
A1
S:g
=D:adj('vuosttaš',ord,attr)	Vuosttaš
									<==== =H:g	
=H:num('logi',sg,nom)	logi        <==== ==H:
D:n('minukta',sg,gen)	minuvtta	<==== ==D:n  
P:v('leat',IV,ind,impf,3sg)	lei
Cs:g
=D:adj('buorre',sg,nom)	buorre
=H:n('áigodat',sg,nom)	áigodat
A:g
=D:prop('Nordlys',Obj,sg,gen)	Nordlysa
=H:prp-post('ektui')	ektui

::: Problem:
::: The @>N in Vuosttaš points to N in minuvtta which again points to
::: logi. The above visl-format cannot be derived from those tags, since
::: the head is Num and @>N cannot point to Num.
LA121107: Well, I see that the tags are not so logical. I will fix in sme-dis.rle, so vuosttaš gets @>Num. And it should be @SUBJ, not @ADVL.

CORRECT - ((It works perfectly after changing sme-dis.rle, except from what is Dum??):
SOURCE: text
SMEB1 Vuosttaš logi minuvtta lei buorre áigodat Nordlysa ektui.
A1
STA:cl
S:g
=Dum:adj('vuosttaš',ord,attr)   Vuosttaš
=H:g
==H:num('logi',sg,nom)  logi
==D:n('minukta',sg,gen) minuvtta
P:v('leat',IV,ind,impf,3sg)     lei
Cs:g
=D:adj('buorre',sg,nom) buorre
=H:n('áigodat',sg,nom)  áigodat
A:g
=D:prop('Nordlys',Obj,sg,gen)   Nordlysa
=H:prp-post('ektui')    ektui
.


@>A should be D
===============

SME658 Muhtun guovlluid gávttiin eai leat nu ollu čiŋat oskku geažil.
A1
A:g
=D:pron('muhtun',<idef>,attr)	Muhtun
=D:n('guovlu',pl,gen)	guovlluid
=H:n('gákti',pl,loc)	gávttiin
P:g
=D:vaux:v('ii',IV,neg,ind,3pl)	eai
=H:v('leat',IV,ind,pr,conneg)	leat
									<==== S:g
D:adv('nu')	nu						<==== =D:  (@>A)
S:g									<==== remove
=D:pron('ollu',<idef>)	ollu		
=H:n('čikŋa',pl,nom)	čiŋat
A:g
=D:n('osku',sg,gen)	oskku
=H:prp-post('geažil')	geažil
.

::: Problem is that @>A modifies adjectives. There is no adjective in
the rest of the text. it seems that here it should be interpreted as
modifying adverbial. So @>A modifies first adjectives, and if not found, adverbials?
LA121107: "nu" modifies "ollu". I will fix the tags in sme-dis.rle

CORRECT (It works perfectly after changing sme-dis.rle):
SMEB1 Muhtun guovlluid gávttiin eai leat nu ollu čiŋat oskku geažil.
A1
STA:cl
A:g
=D:pron('muhtun',<idef>,attr)   Muhtun
=D:n('guovlu',pl,gen)   guovlluid
=H:n('gákti',pl,loc)    gávttiin
P:g
=D:vaux:v('ii',IV,neg,ind,3pl)  eai
=H:v(nfin)('leat',IV,ind,pr,conneg)     leat
S:g
=D:g
==D:adv('nu')   nu
==H:adj('ollu',attr)    ollu
=H:n('čikŋa',pl,nom)    čiŋat
A:g
=D:n('osku',sg,gen)     oskku
=H:prp-post('geažil')   geažil
.



Num @SUBJ + @Q< should be grouped, like in:
===========================================
SME599 Mis leat moadde beatnaga.
A1
A:pron('mun',<pers>,1pl,loc)	Mis
P:v('leat',IV,ind,pr,3pl)	leat
								<==== S:g
S:num('moadde',sg,nom)	moadde	<==== H:
D:n('beana',sg,gen)	beatnaga	<==== D:
.

SME427 Áiggun geahččat dušše moadde filmma.
A1
P:g
=D:vaux:v('áigut',TV,ind,pr,1sg)	Áiggun
=H:v('geahččat',TV,inf)	geahččat
A:adv('dušše')	dušše
								<==== Od:g
Od:num('moadde',sg,acc)	moadde 	<==== =H:num
D:n('filbma',sg,gen)	filmma	<==== =D:n
.

::: Fixed

Paratagmes
==========
And the paratagmes are not quite good yet, when there is a comma.
eg:
SOURCE: text
SME377 Mii oahppat lohkat ja čállit sámegillii.
A1
S:pron('mun',<pers>,1pl,nom)	Mii
P:v('oahppat',TV,ind,pr,1pl)	oahppat
											<==== Od:par
Od:v('lohkat',TV,inf)	lohkat				<==== =CJT:v(nfin)
SUB:conj-s('ja')	ja						<==== =CC:conj
Od:v('čállit',TV,inf)	čállit				<==== =CJT:v(nfin)
A:n('sáme#giella',sg,ill)	sámegillii		
.

SOURCE: text
SME378 Doppe mii sáhttit oastit gáfe, deaja, sávtta dahje bruvssa.
A1
A:adv('doppe')	Doppe
S:pron('mun',<pers>,1pl,nom)	mii
P:g
=D:vaux:v('sáhttit',IV,ind,pr,1pl)	sáhttit
=H:v('oastit',TV,inf)	oastit
								<==== Od:par
Od:n('gáffe',sg,acc)	gáfe	<==== =CJT:n
,
Od:n('deadja',sg,acc)	deaja	<==== =CJT:n
,
Od:par							<==== remove
=CJT:n('sákta',sg,acc)	sávtta	
=SUB:conj-s('dahje')	dahje	<==== =CO:conj
=CJT:n('bruvsa',sg,acc)	bruvssa
.

::: These are fixed.

-------
LA121107: I have changed this one, also in sme-dis.rle. 
CORRECT (how it should be):
SME390 Garraskerrui don vurket visot iežat čállosiid ja govaid ja prográmmaid.
STA:cl
A1
A:n('garra#skearru',sg,ill)	Garraskerrui
S:pron('don',<pers>,2sg,nom)	don
P:v('vurket',TV,ind,pr,2sg)	vurket
Od:g
=D:adj('visot',attr)   visot
=D:pron('ieš',<refl>,gen,poss2sg)	iežat	 
=H:par
==CJT:n('čálus',pl,acc)	čállosiid			 
==CC:conj-s('ja')	ja						 
==CJT:n('govva',pl,acc)	govaid				 
==CC:conj-s('ja')	ja						 
==CJT:n('prográmma',pl,acc)	prográmmaid		 
.

::: This does not work still. It is the general problem with
coordination: which constituents form a pair.