!!!How to handle variation in lexc

!!Non-normative forms: Err/Orth
!Non-normative variant with inflection
ex.: "fálahas" is a non-normative variant of the lemma "fáláhas", and it inflects.
The normative form on the left side, and so the lemma in the analysis will be a normative form and can be found e.g. in the dictionary.

{{fáláhas:fáláhass JOHTOLAT ; }} \\
{{fáláhas+Err/Orth:fálahass JOHTOLAT ; }}

The descriptive FST will inflect both fálahas and fáláhas, but the line with the tag Err/Orth is removed from the normative analyser/generator during the compilation prosess. 
{{{
fáláhasat 
fáláhasat	fáláhas+N+Pl+Nom

fálahasat
fálahasat	fáláhas+Err/Orth+N+Pl+Nom
}}}

The normative analyser:
{{{
fáláhasat 
fáláhasat	fáláhas+N+Pl+Nom


fálahasat
fálahasat	fálahasat	+?
}}}

!Non-normative variant without inflection (hard coding)
ex.: "fálahas" is a non-normative variant of the form "fáláhas", and it does not inflect, and therefore it does not get a continuation lexicon with inflection for nouns.

The normative form on the left side, and so the lemma in the analysis will be a normative form and can be found e.g. in the dictionary.

{{fáláhas:fáláhass JOHTOLAT ; }} \\
{{fáláhas+N+Sg+Nom+Err/Orth:fálahas ENDLEX ; }}



!!The word itself is non-normative: Err/Lex
Ex. brillefutterála which is a slightly adapated loanword from Norwegian to North Saami. The normative word is čalbmelássaskuohppu

{{brillefutterála+Err/Lex:brille#futterál SOSIAL}}

The descriptive FST will inflect brillefutterála, but the line with the tag Err/Lex is removed from the normative analyser/generator during the compilation prosess. 
{{{
brillefutterálat 
brillefutterálat	brillefutterála+N+Pl+Nom
}}}

The normative analyser:
{{{
brillefutterálat
brillefutterálat	brillefutterálat	+?
}}}


!!Lexical homonymi: how to identify the correct lemma e.g. in a dictionary
Two lemmas, which base forms are homonyms, have different paradigms and semantics. 

!The lemmas belong to different stem-categories: Add morphogical tags
Example from North Saami. G3 tag for Grade 3 for consonantgradation with geminate in lemma, e.g. ss: 

{{beassi:beassi BEARRI "reir" ;}} \\
{{beassi+G3:beas'si AIGI "never" ; }}
 
Analysis:
{{{
beassi
beassi	beassi+N+G3+Sg+Nom
beassi	beassi+N+G3+Sg+Acc
beassi	beassi+N+G3+Sg+Gen
beassi	beassi+N+Sg+Nom

beasi
beasi	beassi+N+Sg+Gen
beasi	beassi+N+Sg+Acc
}}}
 
 
Example from North Saami. NomAg tag for derivation Nomen Agent 

{{vuovdi+NomAg:vuovdi ACTOR "salesman" ;}} \\
{{vuovdi:vuov'di AIGI "forest" ; }}

Analysis:
{{{
vuovdi
vuovdi	vuovdi+N+NomAg+Sg+Nom
vuovdi	vuovdi+N+NomAg+Sg+Acc
vuovdi	vuovdi+N+NomAg+Sg+Gen
vuovdi	vuovdi+N+Sg+Nom

vuovddi
vuovddi	vuovdi+N+Sg+Gen
vuovddi	vuovdi+N+Sg+Acc
}}}
 

!There is no reason for adding morphogical tags: Add homonymi tags
Example from South Saami:

{{govledh+Hom1:govl TJOEHPEDH_TV "höra" ;}} \\
{{govledh+Hom2:govl VÅÅJNEDH "höras" ;}}

Analysis:

{{{
gåvla
gåvla	govledh+Hom1+V+TV+Ind+Prs+Sg3

govloe
govloe	govledh+Hom2+V+IV+Ind+Prs+Sg3
}}}


!!Orthograpic variants of the same lemma: tags v1, v2...

Orthograpic variants of the same lemma, for base form and at least parts of the inflection paradigm, should be under the same lemma. But we can add a variants tag as a help to recognize the correct base form for the paradigm.

Example from North Saami. 

{{mandáhta+v2:mandáhtta GOAHTI-A ; }} \\
{{mandáhta+v1:mandáhta STAHTA ;}}

If the base forms are identical, but there are variants in the inflection, we don't use these tags.